American Indians lost their lands when they got hooked on the White Man's goods. This incontrovertible fact is key to understanding the dynamics involved in colonialism, no matter what type or in which historical context. Today, the White/European people of the world are under attack with diverse forms of colonialism, from the reverse kind, involving the wretched NonWhite world moving into our territories, to the cultural Judeo-Marxist one that sells us toys. Both types, in their deadly combination, will result in the almost absolute ethnic cleansing of the White/European people throughout the world. The reason for our quick displacement (speedy if you consider that our grandparents lived in primarily homogenous territories) is almost identical to the American Indian story, at least when it comes to what enticed them into their willful abandonment of territory and their outright sale of their lands.
Some people today don't realize that almost every single initial contact between Europeans and the mongolian tribes that lived in the American continent were amazingly friendly (naively so for both sides). Delving into a full exposition of the story is unnecessary, the simple truth is that these 'natives' became addicted to European technology and power to the point of selling off entire swaths of land, lakes and rivers, all for the sake of owning our items and also in the hopes that these tough and advanced Whites would kill off their own indigenous competition. At the end of their maddening sale, they came to realize that almost all of their ancestral hunting/fishing grounds were theirs no more. Eventually changing their minds, and deciding to take it all back by force, they got butchered. The term "Indian giver" reflects the sentiment of our ancestors at the time.
In other words, their petty desire for "cool stuff" and their belief that utilizing the might of others for their 'strategic' purposes would be beneficial, backfired to the point of their almost complete extinction. Consumerism, albeit a very rudimentary kind, killed the 'indians' and robbed them of their land.
Some people today don't realize that almost every single initial contact between Europeans and the mongolian tribes that lived in the American continent were amazingly friendly (naively so for both sides). Delving into a full exposition of the story is unnecessary, the simple truth is that these 'natives' became addicted to European technology and power to the point of selling off entire swaths of land, lakes and rivers, all for the sake of owning our items and also in the hopes that these tough and advanced Whites would kill off their own indigenous competition. At the end of their maddening sale, they came to realize that almost all of their ancestral hunting/fishing grounds were theirs no more. Eventually changing their minds, and deciding to take it all back by force, they got butchered. The term "Indian giver" reflects the sentiment of our ancestors at the time.
In other words, their petty desire for "cool stuff" and their belief that utilizing the might of others for their 'strategic' purposes would be beneficial, backfired to the point of their almost complete extinction. Consumerism, albeit a very rudimentary kind, killed the 'indians' and robbed them of their land.
Today, most Whites live in a maze of gadgets and entertainment that would make any red skinned savage gasp in mesmerized stupor. Because of our advanced stage of intellectual and developmental evolution, our race has invented almost every single type of technology imaginable and has founded almost every single worthwhile culture this earth has ever seen. Science and literature are both our almost entire and exclusive domain, not only at its genesis but also in the effective practice of it. As with all success, there is a darker side which, unfortunately in our case, is killing us in record numbers. Let us look at the basic and practical causes of our amazing superiority and clearly identify what made us great.
All of these inventions, which stem specifically from a particular genetic and historic context, sprang forth because of our identifiably war-like, ethnocentric, and competitive nature. Other races, of which the Black (Sub-Saharan African) is the most contrasting, lived in far too temperate climes and bountiful regions to merit the development of an intelligence capable of producing even the most rudimentary forms of culture (East-Asians are a separate phenomenon worthy of discussion at another time). As most educated people know, most Blacks (in their native land), even to this very day, are still devoid of a written language (their verbal communication can't convey a sophisticated concept aside from 'hunger', 'anger', 'sex' and 'awe'), music (that isn't primarily devoted to percussion), navigation (without simply siting on a log and pushing it), nor any advanced form of weaponry (aside from their sticks and stones). In short, irrespective of the evolutionary conditions which kept them that way, or whether we like it or not, most NonWhites have been in such primitive levels of development that even Neanderthals seem sophisticated in comparison. This obvious underdevelopment of the NonWhite world has enticed plenty of White/Europeans, for centuries, to give their time and treasure to aggressively civilize (dress them up, give them a language to speak and write, teach them how to build, explain to them the basics of government, etc), all to no avail. We have attempted this either by outright conquest or by "charity" (both being divergent forms of imperialism). Of course, this attempt to "civilize" is not only paternalistic and arrogant, it is also an obvious waste of time. Said colonial sentiments are transparently wasteful and even "immoral" (from an egalitarian perspective) because they admit a sense of superior obligation to impose our concept of morality and civilization on those who simply are not built for it.
These feelings of 'guilty power' only spring from cultures who have too much free time to interpret their existence as a "magical gift" somehow detached from the struggle that brought it forth. In other words, those who feel guilty over their racial success do so because they are dramatically disconnected from the laborious and risky business of building anything worthwhile.
To the poor simpleton Blacks, our mirrors and shiny buckles were enough to encourage thousands of them to metaphorically jump into our ships and abandon their natural habitat. As we can all tell, this act by Blacks has absolutely destroyed their identity and tarnished whatever dignity they originally may have had in their primal state.
These feelings of 'guilty power' only spring from cultures who have too much free time to interpret their existence as a "magical gift" somehow detached from the struggle that brought it forth. In other words, those who feel guilty over their racial success do so because they are dramatically disconnected from the laborious and risky business of building anything worthwhile.
To the poor simpleton Blacks, our mirrors and shiny buckles were enough to encourage thousands of them to metaphorically jump into our ships and abandon their natural habitat. As we can all tell, this act by Blacks has absolutely destroyed their identity and tarnished whatever dignity they originally may have had in their primal state.
![]() |
| Roman Warrior |
What is the basic reality of all great civilizations?
It isn't an "ideal" nor a "principle" per se. Founding principles can theoretically remain within a civilization and still fail when the true founding elements are gone. What truly matters is both the specific race of people who founded said culture and the bellicose nature which gave them the vitality to create it. In very simple terms, it is the sword and he who wields it that defines a civilization. The moment the sword is sheathed and he who must wield it disappears (via miscegenation, integration, or any other ethnic displacement) then said culture can be declared dead.
![]() |
| Norse Warrior |
What role does "morality" or "values" play in all of this?
Morality and values are clearly dependent on the people, culture, and historic placement of those who advocate them. Sometimes, values and morality can be suicidal (which I would thus call bad) or they can be a method to extend and protect the founding culture (which I would thus call good). Some cultures, when founding a new civilization, may already hold that certain types of killing are acceptable, or that certain types of sexual behavior are counterproductive to their scheme of things, or that certain foods are good or bad, or certain music (or no music!), the list is quite endless. But, like I mentioned, even when some of these moral boundaries may end up helping or hurting the particular culture in question, as long as the people remain homogenous and continue to hold the sword of power and violence against all of their enemies, they will be successful until a stronger group finds a way to destroy them (in any way possible). This is why plenty of "degenerate" or "barbarian" cultures in the past survived for a long time irrespective of how their values are judged by modern standards. If their main value was war and racism, they survived longer than any other culture we may deem to be highly moralistic. If their morality is meant to impose racial cohesiveness, or respect the leadership principle for the sake of martial strength, then said morality will function for survival.
If a savvy culture wishes to keep their civilization alive for a very long time, they will merge their morality, myths, and every single ancillary element within their society into the racial and warlike objectives of their ancestors. They will be xenophobic (distrustful of strangers), desirous of conquest and power, obsessive in their martial culture, and ritualistic in their power structure (primitive monarchy being a good example). They will basically use morality as a tool to convert a small people into a civilization that will pierce the veil of history into eternity. Rome, Sparta, Ancient Egypt, and many others after them, exemplify this dynamic very well. Their morality varied, their gods as well, but their core thrust was almost identical, at least in their golden years, before they lost this particular energy and died very shameful deaths. We are not talking here about a sanitized conceptual death, or an impersonal historic death, this is literally the physical end of the people and their progeny.
How do you convince a racist warrior to give up his weapons, earned privileges, and hand over their civilization to usurping and pathetically inferior strangers?
You offer them the illusion of comfort.
You offer them the illusion of comfort.
![]() |
| Spartan Warrior |
Spartans were notorious for throwing their deformed and/or weak looking infants from a cliff to die (old school eugenics), today we treat deformed freaks as "special". Spartans used to take young males away into harsh military training, today we send them to "fat camp" (if they allow it). Spartan mothers and wives used to tell their men "either with your shield or on your shield" (i.e. either victory or death), today they will sue anybody who hurts their feelings at work.
![]() |
| Celtic Warrior |
Do we still have it in us?
![]() |
| Iberian Warrior |
![]() |
| Batavian/German Warrior |








This is a monumental and beautifully-written article. It should be widely-read; consider submitting it to Counter Currents, perhaps, as it cuts quickly to the bone and uses language in an efficient and effective manner -- great positive conditioning messages for the Folk.
ReplyDeleteThank you!
This is my first visit to your blog! But I admire the precious time and effort you put into it,especially into interesting articles you share here. Thankyou very much and keep up the good work.
ReplyDeletehelp me with my essay
affordable market
adult market
cheap online degrees
rice exporters
But... but... i die from boredom without my daily dose of Howard Stern, ice cream and twinkies!
ReplyDeleteNo-no, this is nasty loooking future.
:(
Mom, where's my remote?!
Wow, truly an excellent, well researched, and inspiring thesis/ article! Great imagery too. I agree with Declan above, deserves wider publication as it surely provides positive direction for the growing White awakenment that is taking place.
ReplyDelete